Before we can decipher even a single Linear A tablet on olive oil, we must decipher as many as we can in Linear B, because... PART A:* delivery *of olive oil
Before we can plausibly (and frequently tentatively) decipher even a single Linear A tablet on olive oil, we must decipher as many as we can in Linear B, because there are* so many facets to be taken fully into consideration *in the olive oil sub-sector of the agricultural sector of the Minoan/Mycenaean economy related to the production of olive oil which on an adequate number of Linear B tablets (at least 10), mostly from Knossos, dealing with harvesting from olive oil trees and the production and delivery of olive oil that we must account for every single term related to olive oil on the Linear B tablets, and then compile a list of all of these terms in order to* cross-correlate *these with equivalent terms on the Linear A tablets, mostly from Haghia Triada.
Another vital factor which just occurred to me is that the Minoan economy appears to have been primarily centred in Haghia Triada, while the Mycenaean primarily in Knossos, with valuable contributions from Pylos as well. In other words, the *economic centre* or power house, if you will, of the Minoan economy appears to have been Haghia Triada and not Knossos. I am somewhat baffled by the fact that researchers to date have not taken this important factor adequately into account. It appears to reveal that Knossos had not yet risen to prominence in the Minoan economy in the Middle Minoan Period (ca. 2100-1600 BCE):
The gravest challenge confronting us in the cross-correlation of the several economic terms related to olive oil production in the late Minoan III 3a period under Mycenaean suzerainty (ca. 1500-1450 BCE) with potentially equivalent terms in Minoan Linear A arises from the mathematical theoretical constructs of *combinations* and *permutations*. Given, for instance, that there are potentially a dozen (**12**) terms related to olive oil production on an adequate number (10-12) Linear B tablets to afford effectual cross-correlation, how on earth are we to know which terms in Mycenaean Linear B correspond to apparently similar terms in Minoan Linear A? In other words, if we for instance extrapolate a total of **12** terms from Mycenaean Linear B tablets, how are we to line or match up the Mycenaean Linear B terms in a “Column A” construct with those in Minoan Linear B in “Column B”? There is no practical way that we can safely assert that term A (let us say, for the sake of expediency, that this word is *apudosi *= “delivery”) in Mycenaean Greek corresponds to term A in Minoan Linear A, rather than any of B-L, *in any permutation and/or in any combination*. This leads us straight into the trap of having to assign ALL of the *signified* (terms) in Mycenaean Linear A to all of the *signified* in Minoan Linear B. I shall only be able to definitively demonstrate this quandary after I have deciphered as many Linear B tablets on olive oil as I possibly can.
For the time being, we have no choice but to set out on our search with these 3 tablets, all of which prepend the first term *apudosi* = “delivery” to the ideogram for olive oil. In closing, I wish to emphatically stress that this is precisely the signified I expected to turn up in the list of terms potentially related to olive oil production in Mycenaean Linear B. It is also *the most important of all Mycenaean Linear B terms prepended to the ideogram for **“olive** oil**”** on the Linear B tablets. *When we come to making the fateful decision to assign the the “correct” Minoan Linear A term meaning just that, “delivery” on the Linear A tablets dealing with olive oil, how are we to know which Linear A signified corresponds to Linear B apudosi = “delivery”? Still the situation is not as bad as you might think, at least for this term. Why so? Because if it appears (much) more often on the Linear B tablets (say, theoretically,** 5** times versus *less than* 5 for all the other terms in Linear B related to olive oil), then *the term appearing the most frequently on Minoan Linear A tablets related to olive oil is more likely than not to be the equivalent of ***apudosi**, i.e. to mean “delivery”.
The less frequent the occurrence of any particular term relative to olive oil on the Mycenaean Linear B tablets, the greater the room there is for error, to the point that where a term appears *only once* on all of the Linear B tablets we can manage to muster up for translation, it becomes next to impossible to properly align that term with any of the terms occurring *only once *on the Minoan Linear A tablets, especially where more than one *signified* occurs on the Mycenaean Linear B tablets. If for example, **3 **terms occur only once on the Linear B tablets, which one(s) aligns with which one(s) on the Linear A? A messy scenario. But we must make the best of the situation, bite the bullet, and cross-correlate these 3 terms in all permutations and combinations (= **9**!) from the Linear B to the Linear A tablets containing them. This I shall definitively illustrate in a Chart once I have translated all terms related to olive oil production in Mycenaean Linear A.

### Like this:

Like Loading...

You must be logged in to post a comment.